[Article] In-vehicle machine successor evaluation report (2)

■ This is an article posted on June 2017, 7, so the content of the information may be out of date.

As the successor to the in-vehicle machine that was well received,Last reportSo, as a result of packing in even higher performance, the performance was sufficient, but it was not sold in terms of exhaust heat and stability.

We have continued to verify it, but we are happy to announce that we are finally able to guide you.

[Decision specifications]

<Successor plan as of the last time>

<Current product>

Measuring method, tools

The measurement used PCMark8 for comparison with the previous configuration.
PCMark8 (https://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/pcmark8)

Decision specifications Benchmark measurement results

Click here for the previous test machine measurement results

* Click each image to enlarge

It is the result of running the CREATIVE, HOME, and WORK benches from above.Last testI got a better score (speed) result than. In addition, there was no temperature problem in the load test situation for a long time.

Conclusion 1 (performance)

About machine performance:
It is even better on the benchmark than the previous test machine.

About CPU temperature:
In the previous test machine, the temperature was not stable and it was overheating, but with this configuration, the temperature change is stable at a level that does not affect operation.

About stability:
In the previous test machine, there was a blue screen problem immediately after turning on the power, but this configuration did not cause such a problem, and it was confirmed that it could operate stably.

Conclusion 2 (Practical use / Adoption)

Since the chassis cooler is the same, we were able to balance performance and stability by making subtle changes and adjustments to the motherboard, CPU, and M.2 storage used. In the future, I think that we will propose an in-vehicle PC with this configuration.

We are waiting for inquiries about in-vehicle machines!